论文部分内容阅读
目的分析研究中药保护的现有模式,为完善其发展走向和定位奠定基础。方法采用文献分析法,综合实施现状分析现有模式下的我国中药保护。结果我国中药资源丰富,然而这些资源在纳入现代法律保护体系时却无法由既有的知识产权制度有效融合,因此,国家对中药的保护主要采用了行政保护与司法保护两种替代性模式,其中行政保护制度即中药品种保护制度长期以来占据重要的位置。该制度为尝试弥补专利之不足而设计,但在适用过程中却逐渐显现出功能设计之缺位。结论现阶段唯有在知识产权基本框架下,把鼓励创新作为实施品种保护的优位选择,并实现中药品种保护制度与专利制度的衔接与互补,才是解决问题的基本出路。
Objective To analyze and study the existing patterns of TCM protection and lay the foundation for improving its development direction and orientation. Methods The method of literature analysis, integrated implementation of the status quo analysis of Chinese medicine under the existing mode of protection. As a result, there are abundant resources of traditional Chinese medicine in our country. However, when these resources are incorporated into the modern legal protection system, they can not be effectively integrated by the existing intellectual property system. Therefore, the state adopts two alternative modes of administrative protection and judicial protection, The system of administrative protection, that is, the protection of varieties of Chinese medicines, has long occupied an important position. The system is designed to try to make up for the lack of patents, but in the process of application, it gradually shows the absence of functional design. Conclusion Only under the basic framework of intellectual property rights, encouraging innovation as a good candidate for implementing breed protection and realizing the convergence and complementarity between the breed protection system and the patent system at the current stage is the basic solution to the problem.