50岁以上的人都知道,在60年代初,史学界围绕“历史主义”问题展开过一场波及整个理论界、学术界持续几年的重大争论(或论战)。《历史研究》在这场争论中扮演了重要角色,而我当时正负责该刊编辑部工作。引起广泛关注的范文澜的反对放空炮,蔡美彪评论农民战争史研究的论文,宁可论历史主义的两篇文章,是由主编黎澍约写,由我负责编发的。后来某些人利用历史主义问题大作文章,在史学领域搞“文化大革命”,翦伯赞被迫害致死,黎澍被打倒,许多历史主义的主张者横遭摧残,我也受到牵连。正因为 People over the age of 50 know that in the early 1960s, the historians started a major debate (or controversy) that lasted for many years in the theoretical circle and academic circles around the issue of “historicism.” “Historical research” has played an important role in this debate, and I was in charge of the editorial department of the journal. Fan Wenlan, which attracted widespread attention, opposed the blow-out of artillery. Cai Mei-biao’s essay on the research on the history of peasant war, rather on two articles of historicism, was written by editor-in-chief Li Shuyue and edited by me. Later, some people used the issue of historicism to make a fuss about the issue. They engaged in “Cultural Revolution” in the field of history, they were tortured to death, Li Shu was beaten down, and many historian advocates were destroyed. I was also implicated. because