“选”不如“选择”4月8日上海某报第7版刊有《如果萨达姆政权仍存在,国际社会将面临战后尴尬(引题)两个政权选哪个?(主题)》一文。主标题中单个一个“选”字易生歧义,因为“选”字可有多种解释。一种常用解释为“选举”用在这里显然不合逻辑,因为“国际社会”不可能去“选举”某国的政权。另一种解 The “election” is better than the “choice” On April 8, the seventh edition of a newspaper in Shanghai said: “If the Saddam regime still exists, the international community will face the post-war embarrassed (question) which of the two regimes? . The single ”choice“ word in the main title is ambiguous because ”choice“ can have a variety of interpretations. One common explanation is that it is apparently illogical to use ”elections“ here because it is impossible for the ”international community“ to ”elect" the political power of a country. Another solution