论文部分内容阅读
目的观察不同方法治疗心血管内科不稳定性心绞痛的临床疗效。方法选取本院心血管内科收治的不稳定性心绞痛患者92例作为样本,以46例为一组,将其随机分为治疗组与对照组两组。对照组采用常规方法治疗,治疗组联合给予患者曲美他嗪治疗。观察两组治疗效果。结果治疗后,治疗组患者心绞痛发作频率(1.36±0.19)次/d、发作时间(5.11±0.81)min/次、治疗有效率93.48%,与对照组相比,具有明显优势(P<0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生几率对比,无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论应将曲美他嗪与阿司匹林等常规药物联合应用到不稳定性心绞痛的治疗中,提高疾病治疗有效率及安全性。
Objective To observe the clinical effects of different methods in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris in cardiovascular medicine. Methods 92 patients with unstable angina pectoris admitted to our hospital for cardiovascular medicine were selected as samples, and 46 patients were randomly divided into two groups: treatment group and control group. The control group was treated by conventional method, while the treatment group was given trimetazidine treatment. Observation of two groups treatment effect. Results After treatment, the frequency of angina pectoris (1.36 ± 0.19) / episode and the onset time (5.11 ± 0.81) min / time in treatment group was 93.48%, which was significantly higher than that in control group (P <0.05) . There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion Trimetazidine and aspirin and other conventional drugs should be applied to the treatment of unstable angina pectoris, improve disease treatment efficiency and safety.