论文部分内容阅读
分析了《中华耳科学杂志》52篇来稿中引用的565条文献,发现有51篇的225条引文存在各种错误,其中17篇(33%)为书写错误,不影响读者检索;34篇(67%)为实质性错误,影响读者检索或对引文内容的理解。后者可分为两类。①引用内容错误:把原作者的观点引反,引错内容或引用的内容在原文中根本不存在;虚假引用或间接引用,即不直接查对原始资料,而是转引他人的二手文献,常常将内容引错。②引用形式上的错误:引错作者姓名、篇名或期刊名,以及出版年份、版次和卷、期、页码错误。探讨了从技术层面上和从提高思想认识上增加引文准确性的办法。
An analysis of 565 articles cited in 52 articles published in Journal of Ootheuralogy of Auris in China found that there were 51 errors in 225 articles, of which 17 (33%) were errors in writing and did not affect readers’ search. 34 articles 67%) as a substantive error, affecting readers to retrieve or understand the content of the citation. The latter can be divided into two categories. ① reference to the contents of the error: the original author’s point of view, the wrong content or quoted content does not exist in the original text; false references or indirect references, that is not directly check the original data, but refer to other people’s second- Quoting the content often. ② reference to the form of error: cited the wrong author’s name, title or periodical name, and the year of publication, version and volume, period, page number error. Explores ways to increase the accuracy of citation from the technical level and from improving the ideological understanding.