《艺术界LEAP》2011年十二月号刊登了来自高名潞现当代艺术研究中心的批评家王志亮撰写的文章《王广义的“小运动”?——谈“珠海会议”的起源与性质》,质疑我们采用了不当的“历史研究方法”进行个案研究,忽略了“珠海会议”的权力结构和艺术话语博弈。对于这样的论调,我们难以认同。“小运动”不是一次历史性的回顾,而是我们根据自身的实践体验和未来想象对于历史中和当下正在发生的实践进行的一次再度观看和编织。“小运动”本身就是一 “Art LEAP” December 2011 issue of the article “Wang Guangyi’s” Little Movements “written by Wang Zhiliang, a critic from the Center for the Study of Contemporary Art in Gao Minglun, talks about the origin of” Zhuhai Conference “ And nature ”, we questioned whether we adopted improper“ historical research methods ”for case studies and ignored the power structure and art discourse game in Zhuhai Conference. We can hardly agree with such arguments. “Little sports” is not a historical review, but rather a re-viewing and weaving of practices that are taking place in history and now, based on our own practical experience and future imagination. “Little exercise ” itself is one