论文部分内容阅读
药品检验报告书是各级药品检验所对药品质量检验后依法作出的技术裁定书,理应具有法律效力。但在实际工作中,是否所有药品检验报告书都具有法律效力?依何标准来断定某一具体药品检验报告书是否具有法律效力?参照非法定标准检验的药品检验报告能否认定一概没有法律效力?药品检验报告书的法律效力体现在何处?其法律效力范围又如何确定?其复印件是否有法律效力?其报告书的结论能否都按照《药品检验所工作管理办法》第二十一条执行?如何尽快搞清上述若干法律问题,对依照药品检验报告书来处理有关假劣药品案件的执法工作尤为重要,而有关这些问题的探讨尚未见诸报刊杂志。现将作者的初浅见解介绍如下,与同行讨论。
Drug test report is at all levels of drug testing on the quality of drugs after the test made by the law, should have the force of law. However, in actual work, are all the drug test reports have the force of law? According to the standard to determine whether a specific drug test report has the force of law? Non-statutory standard test reference to the drug test report can be found to have no legal effect The legal validity of the drug inspection report is reflected in the scope of its legal validity and how to determine its copy of the law has the force of the report its conclusions can be in accordance with the “drug inspection work management practices” twenty-first As soon as possible to clarify the above legal issues, it is particularly important for the enforcement of drug counterfeit drugs cases to be handled in accordance with the drug inspection reports. However, there is no discussion of these issues in newspapers and magazines. Now the author’s superficial insights are as follows, with colleagues to discuss.