案例中教师希望幼儿站在鼠小弟的立场上思考借或不借,而涛涛却站在了小鸭的立场上质疑:小背心这么小,小鸭穿不下,它会提出借背心这样的要求吗?面对幼儿的提问,教师选择了回避。正因为这样,涛涛继续对故事情节提出质疑:猴子跑到地上来干吗,海狮为什么能上岸……涛涛的多次质疑虽然没有得到教师的正面回应,却引起了同伴的注意,以致幼儿“集体溜号”了。(江西抚州吴丹) In the case, the teacher would like the young child to think or not to stand by his younger brother’s position, while Tao Tao stands on the duckling’s question: the small vest is so small that the duckling can not wear it. It will ask for a vest In the face of young children’s questions, the teacher chose to avoid. Because of this, Taotao continue to question the storyline: why the monkeys ran to the ground, why sea lions can go ashore ... Taotao repeatedly questioned although they did not get a positive response from the teachers, it attracted the attention of peers, resulting in children “Collective slipped ”. (Fuzhou, Jiangxi Wu Dan)