论文部分内容阅读
最近,有报道说,长春一位老人在菜市场晕倒,178名路人无人去扶老人,事件中仅有一位白衣女子陪伴老人身边,一直到120救护人员赶来。老人摔倒了扶不扶的问题再一次被提上道德层面,有媒体报道此事时拿出了178:1这样的数据来吸引眼球。各种报道接踵而至,评论也形成了“一边倒”的态势,很多网友的留言和跟帖尽是谴责和追问。诸如:是什么让178个人道德尽失?那178个人的道德丢在哪里了?这样的标题看着就让人不安。笔者在这里不是替那个所谓的数据说话,也不是给那些冷
Recently, it has been reported that an elderly person in Changchun fainted in the vegetable market and 178 passers-by had stopped going to help the elderly. Only one white woman accompanied the elderly in the incident and 120 ambulances arrived. Once again, the problem that the elderly have fallen by the wayside has been raised to the ethical level. When the media reported this, they came up with the data of 178: 1 to attract the attention. Various reports came one after another, comments also formed “one-sided ” situation, many users message and thread is all condemned and asked. Such as: What makes 178 personal moral loss? That 178 people lost their morality? Such a headline look uncomfortable. I am not here to speak for that so-called data, nor to those cold