《纽约公约》第5条第2款的规定为各国法院适用公共秩序拒绝适用国际商事仲裁裁决提供了依据,然而公共秩序存在着多种解释,自公约实施以来,参加公约的亚洲各国法院提出了各种主张并在实践中有了各种做法,本文对中国、新加坡、日本、印度尼西亚等国的理论与实践进行了分析,对各国法院的做法进行了总结。 The provisions of article 5, paragraph 2, of the New York Convention provide the basis for courts in all countries to refuse the application of international commercial arbitral awards for public order. However, there are many explanations for public order. Since the Convention was implemented, the courts in Asian countries have proposed Various propositions and practices have taken various approaches. This article analyzes the theory and practice of China, Singapore, Japan, Indonesia and other countries and sums up the practice of courts in various countries.