目前各地都在进行档案的清理、鉴定工作,据我所见所闻,有几个涉及到质量的问题很值得注意。一、什么都舍不得,不该留存的也留。这是一种偏向。我们所以要鉴定,就是要分清玉石,便于今后的保管、利用,如果什么都舍不得,实质上就是否认鉴定,不要分清玉石。任何事物都要一分为二,档案的保管价值也是如此。什么都舍不得,就是不懂得这个客观事实,因此在实际工作中,有些不应该划永久的也划为永久保管,该划定期的而划了长期,该剔除的而划为定期或长期。结果仍然是玉石未分或基本未分。与此相反的另一种倾向是,认为过去的事儿都沒有用,这更是不对。他们主要是从目前查不查找来考虑的,沒有全面考虑其长远利用价值,结果是,留存的很少,剔除的过多。我认为这是两种片面和表面看问題的倾向,必须防止。二、只求速度不强调质量。表面上抽调相当多的人力,看来很重视,但在鉴定、组卷质量上强调不严,措 At present, the files are being cleaned and appraised all over the country. As far as I can tell, there are several issues concerning quality that are worth noting. First, what are reluctant, should not be retained also stay. This is a bias. We have to identify, that is, to distinguish jade, for the future custody, use, if anything reluctant, in essence, deny the identification, do not distinguish jade. Everything should be divided into two parts, the custody of the file as well. What we are reluctant with is that we do not understand this objective fact. Therefore, in practical work, some should not be classified as permanent and permanent. The term is defined as long-term and the term is defined as fixed or long-term. The result is still jade is not divided or basically not divided. The other opposite is that it is even wrong to think that nothing in the past has been used. They mainly consider from the current investigation not to find, did not fully consider its long-term value, as a result, retained little, removed too much. I think this is a tendency of two kinds of one-sided and superficial problems and must be prevented. Second, only speed does not emphasize quality. On the surface of a considerable amount of manpower, it seems very seriously, but in the identification, the quality of the group lax stress, measures