论文部分内容阅读
6月8日下午,在华东模范中学考点外,一名考生因为迟到了2分钟,不能进入考场。考生的妈妈又是求情又是下跪,考生还差点做出过激行为,最终考生还是未能参加考试。(据东方网)这是一起引起广泛争议的高考事件。一个网上调查表明,有36.7%的网友认为“应让考生进场,考场也需人性化”;41%的网友则表示“坚决挡在门外,无规矩不成方圆”;另有19.9%的网友投票给“应让考生进场,但以其他方式惩罚,如减分”。从数字上看,赞成让考生进考场的超过了50%。我们该为数字背后的人性向善感到欣慰,还是该为民众整体规则意识的欠缺感到遗憾?笔者的遗
On the afternoon of June 8, one candidate was denied entry to the examination room because of being late for 2 minutes outside of the East China Model High School. Candidates of the mom is pleasing and kneeling, the candidates almost make an exaggerated behavior, the final candidates still failed to take the exam. (According to Dongfang Wang) This is a controversial college entrance examination caused by a wide range of events. An online survey showed that 36.7% of users think that “candidates should be admitted and the examination room needs to be humane.” 41% of users said that they “stand firm in the door and have no rules.” Another 19.9% of users voted “should allow candidates to approach the scene, but punished in other ways, such as subtracting points.” Digitally speaking, in favor of candidates into the examination room more than 50%. Should we be gratified with the goodness of human nature behind the numbers or should we regret the lack of public awareness of the overall rules?