“亚细亚生产方式”之争由来已久,成为马克思社会历史理论的一桩公案。本文以该论述的经典文本表述为依据,从两大区分(社会形态和社会经济形态的区分以及“亚洲式的社会”和“亚细亚生产方式”的区分)入手,并将亚细亚生产方式社会归为第一大社会形态;通过对“亚细亚生产方式”作静态和动态的考查,得出亚细亚的、古代的和封建的生产方式全都属于前资本主义生产方式,这三种生产方式不存在依次更替的关系,资产阶级经济是亚细亚的、古代的和封建的经济形式解体的可能性结果。 “Asian mode of production, ” a long time of dispute, a Marxist social and historical theory of a public case. Based on the classical texts of this discourse, this article starts from the distinction between the two major divisions (the distinction between social forms and socio-economic forms and the distinction between “Asian-style society” and “Asian-style production patterns”), The society as the largest social form; through the “Asian mode of production” for static and dynamic examination, concluded that Asia, the ancient and feudal modes of production all belong to the pre-capitalist mode of production, the three kinds of production There is no alternation between the ways in which the bourgeois economy is the result of the disintegration of Asian, ancient and feudal economic forms.