论文部分内容阅读
AIM:To evaluate whether red meat intake is related to the risk of endometrial cancer(EC) using meta-analysis.METHODS:We searched Pub Med,EMBASE,and the Cochrane Library up to June 2013,using common keywords related to red meat and EC.Case-control studies and cohort studies comparing the risk of endometrial cancer among categories by the amount of intake were included.Eleven case-control studies and five cohort studies met our criteria.We performed a conventional and a dose-response meta-analysis of case-control studies using the Der Simonian-Laird method for random-effects.For cohort studies we performed a conventional meta-analysis.Publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s test.RESULTS:In the meta-analysis of 11 case-control studies including 5419 cases and 12654 controls,higher red meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of EC [summary relative risk(SRR) = 1.43,95%CI:1.15-1.79;I2 = 73.3% comparing extreme intake categories).In a dose-response analysis,for red meat intake of 100 g/d,SRR was 1.84(95%CI:1.64-2.05).In contrast,in the meta-analysis of five prospective studies including a total of 2549 cases among 247746 participants,no significant association between red meat intake and EC risk(SRR = 0.97,95%CI:0.85-1.11;I2 = 4.9% comparing extreme intake categories) was observed.CONCLUSION:Our meta-analysis found a significantlinear association between red meat intake and EC risk based on case-control studies but this was not confirmed in prospective studies.
AIM: To evaluate whether red meat intake is related to the risk of endometrial cancer (EC) using meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched Pub Med, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to June 2013, using common keywords related to red meat and EC. Case-control studies and cohort studies comparing the risk of endometrial cancer among categories by the amount of intake were included. Eleven case-control studies and five cohort studies met our criteria. We performed a conventional and a dose-response meta-analysis of case-control studies using the Der Simonian-Laird method for random-effects. For cohort studies we performed a conventional meta-analysis. Publications bias was evaluated using Egger’s test .RESULTS: In the meta-analysis of 11 case-control studies including 5419 cases and 12654 controls, higher red meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of EC [summary relative risk (SRR) = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.15-1.79; I2 = 73.3% compared with extreme intake categories) .In a dose- response analysis, for red meat i In contrast, in the meta-analysis of five prospective studies including a total of 2549 cases among 247746 participants, no significant association between red meat intake and EC risk (SRR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.85-1.11; I2 = 4.9% vs. extreme intake categories) was observed. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis found a significant linear association between red meat intake and EC risk based on case-control studies but this was not confirmed in prospective studies