论文部分内容阅读
当前要解决领导的认识观,也就是领导与专家、与智囊团的关系.一方面决策要依靠专家,另一方面专家不能代替领导决策.领导决策时要想到专家,但又不为专家所左右.专家参预领导的决策过程,但又不要越位.专家越位将受到排斥,越位多,排斥越大.专家将意见提供给领导,领导采纳也罢不采纳也罢,不应气馁心灰.即使不采纳,在某种意义上也是成绩,就是使领导能够兼听则明.美国兰德公司的咨询意见采纳率也只有25%.但往往事后证明兰德公司的意见是对的,因而名声大振.例如46年兰德公司就建议美国发射人造卫星,结果没有被重视,57年苏联发射人造卫星引起的轰动之中,人们想起兰德公司的建议而引起振动.对制造中子弹兰德公司也很早提出了建议,这些当时没被采纳,而事后证明它比采纳的建议更提高了兰德公司的威望.因此当智囊团要有广阔的胸怀.而当领导重视智囊团时,往往是智囊团困难之时.领导往往将智囊团当作心肠,当作秘书班子,使智囊团跟着领导团团转,这将丧失智囊团应有的作用.因此,智囊团要跟领导保持一定的距离,它不是秘书班子,而是独立的研究班子.智囊团的建议只能对领导的,而不是针对左右的.智囊团要旗帜鲜明,但又不争发明权,领导采纳并贯彻的建议不一定要让人知道是谁提出来.智囊团要善于保护自己.方案应力求多个.
The current understanding of the leadership to understand the concept, that is, the relationship between leaders and experts, and think tanks .On the one hand, experts rely on the decision-making, on the other hand, experts can not replace the leadership decision-making .Lead decision-making experts, but not experts Experts participate in the leadership of the decision - making process, but do not offside.Experts will be excluded from the offside, more offside, the greater the exclusion .Experts provide advice to the leadership, the leadership adopted or not to take it, should not be discouraged .Even without adoption, In a sense, the result is that the leadership can also listen to the principle that the United States Rand Corporation’s advice rate of adoption is only 25%, but often later proved Rand’s opinion is correct, so fame .For example, 46 years orchid German company suggested that the United States launch satellites, the results have not been taken seriously, 57 Soviet satellite launch caused by a sensation, people think of Rand’s proposal caused by the vibration.For the manufacture of the middle of the balloon Rand Company also made a very early proposal, These were not adopted at the time, and it was later shown that it made RAND Corporation more prestigious than the advice it adopted, so think tanks should have a broad mindset. It is often the brainchild of think tanks, which are often thought of as think tanks, as secretarial groups, that enable think tanks to follow the lead, which will deprive the think tank of its role. It is not a secretarial team, but an independent research group. The think tank’s advice can only be for leadership, not for the right and left. The think tank should have a clear-cut view but not to dispute the right of invention and lead the adoption and implementation of the recommendations You do not have to know who proposed it, think tanks are good at protecting yourself.