论文部分内容阅读
近年来,因中国文物艺术品拍卖市场赝品泛滥,知假拍假情况屡见不鲜,《拍卖法》第六十一条成为众矢之的。基于对该条款的透彻解读,文章认为此条款内容当属客观,之所以实践中出现诸多问题,只因规定不够具体,缺乏可操作性。相对于彻底废除条款的建议,进一步明确拍卖人的法定义务,细化条款的适用前提和条件,从程序上保障该条款立法精神和立法目的的实现,是更为可行的一种选择。
In recent years, due to the proliferation of fake artifacts in the Chinese cultural relics auction market, it is not uncommon for fake auctions to be known, and Article 61 of the Auction Law becomes the object of criticism. Based on a thorough interpretation of the article, the article considers that the clauses of this article belong to the objective category. Many problems arose in practice because of the lack of specific provisions and the lack of maneuverability. Relative to the proposal of completely abolishing the clause, it is a more feasible option to further clarify the legal obligations of the auctioneer, refine the applicable prerequisites and conditions of the clause, and safeguard the legislative spirit and legislative purpose of the clause procedurally.