论文部分内容阅读
目的 :检测多维记忆评估量表 (MMAS)的信度和效度。方法 :根据 694名 6～ 91岁被试的MMAS测试结果作了同质信度、结构效度和实证效度检验 ,以 5 6名被试间隔 2 0天的两次测试资料计算重测信度 ,以WMS -RC为效标考查效标效度。结果 :分测验的重测信度在 0 5 2 6～ 0 93 5之间 ,组合分的重测信度在 0 76以上 ;分测验的分半信度 (0 2 65～ 0 970 )、α系数 (0 2 46～ 0 95 7)和概化系数 (0 2 45～ 0 95 7)多数在 0 60以上 ;MMAS组合分与WMS -RC记忆商的相关为 0 40 0～ 0 745 ,有关分测验的相关 0 3以上 ;各分测验之间的相关 (0 191～ 0 785 ) ,及与对应组合分的相关多数在 0 5以上 ,多维构想得到证实 ;分测验成绩和组合分与教育呈正相关 (0 15 6～ 0 764 ) ;在儿童组分测验成绩和组合分与年龄呈正相关 (0 2 14～0 75 9)、在成人和老人组分测验成绩和组合分与年龄呈负相关 (-0 198～ -0 5 95 ) ,各分测验的区分效度为0 2 78～ 0 889。结论 :MMAS的重测信度、同质信度、结构效度、效标效度和实证效度均较理想 ,符合心理测量学的要求
Objective: To test the reliability and validity of multi-dimensional memory assessment scale (MMAS). Methods: According to the MMAS test results of 694 subjects aged from 6 to 91, we made a test of homogeneity reliability, structural validity and empirical validity. The test data were used to calculate the test-retest letter Degree to WMS -RC as the benchmark to test the validity of the standard. Results: The retest reliability of the subtest was between 0 5 2 6 and 0 93 5, the retest reliability of the combination was above 0 76, the subtest half reliability (0 2 65 ~ 0 970), α The coefficients (0 2 46 ~ 0 95 7) and the generalized coefficients (0 2 45 ~ 0 95 7) were all over 0 60. The correlation between MMAS and WMS-RC was 0 40 0 ~ 0 745, (0 191 ~ 0 785) between the sub-tests and the correlation majority with the corresponding combination scores above 0 5, the multidimensional conception was confirmed; the test scores and combination points were positively correlated with education (0 15 6 ~ 0 764). There was a positive correlation between scores of test scores and age of children in children group (0 2 14 ~ 0 75 9) 0 198 ~ -0 5 95). The discriminant validity of each subtest was 0 2 78 ~ 0 889. Conclusion: The retest reliability, homogeneity reliability, structural validity, validity of validity and validity of MMAS are all satisfactory, which are in line with the requirements of psychometrics