论文部分内容阅读
清代围绕如何处置台湾,曾出现两次论争。第一次在康熙年间,康熙君臣曾就如何统一台湾进行了长达二十余年的群策群议,大臣们或主张招抚或主张武力攻取,对台策略几经转变,最终康熙帝果断下令武力统一台湾,采纳施琅的建议在台湾驻兵管辖。第二次在光绪年间《马关条约》换约之前,官员士子连篇累牍上书拒绝割让台湾岛,甚至请求清廷废约再战,但最终却以《马关条约》的盖棺定论而宣告失败。两次论争的结局不同,参与的人员范围不同,产生的影响不同,但都不难看出时人对台湾重要地位的肯定。
Qing Dynasty around how to dispose of Taiwan, there have been two controversies. For the first time during the reign of Emperor Kangxi, Emperor Kangxi once conducted a group-work group discussion on how to unify Taiwan for more than 20 years. Ministers advocated appeasement or advocated force capture. After several changes in Taiwan’s tactics, Emperor Kangxi decisively ordered the use of force To unify Taiwan and adopt Shi Lang’s suggestion to station troops in Taiwan for jurisdiction. For the second time before the contract of the Treaty of Shimonoseki was re-signed in the Guangxu period, officials and scholars repeatedly wrote a letter refusing to cede the island of Taiwan and even asked the Qing court to repeal the war, but eventually failed with the sacking conclusion of the Treaty of Shimonoseki . The outcome of the two debates is different, the range of personnel involved is different, and the impact they produce is different. However, it is not hard to see people’s affirmation of Taiwan’s important status.