论文部分内容阅读
目的观察采供血质量管理体系实施效果。方法比较2005—2008年我血站的采血控制、血液成分制备控制和血液保存发放控制情况,观察相应质量测量指标的变化。结果血液成分制备非正常报废率、血库非正常报废率以及采血非正常报废率均<1%,但2007年血液总非正常报废率>1%,主要是血液成分制备非正常报废率较高;4个年度血液非正常报废情况比较,差异有统计学意义。全血采集不足量率和采血非正常报废率有逐年下降的迹象,2007和2008年单采血小板采集不足量率均<1%,但高于2005和2006年,4个年度血液采集不足量情况比较,差异有统计学意义。结论本站实施质量管理体系后,总的来说收到较好的效果,但仍有部分质量目标值没达到本站质量体系文件所预定的质量目标要求。
Objective To observe the effect of blood supply and quality control system. Methods Blood samples were collected from 2005 to 2008 for blood control, preparation control of blood components and control of blood preservation and release, and the corresponding quality measurement indexes were observed. Results The abnormal rejection rate, abnormal blood bank rejection rate and non-normal blood withdrawal rate were all less than 1%. However, the total abnormal blood reject rate was> 1% in 2007, mainly due to the higher rejection rate of blood components. Four annual blood non-normal scrap comparison, the difference was statistically significant. Insufficient rates of whole blood collection and non-normal rejection of blood sampling have shown signs of declining year by year. In 2007 and 2008, the insufficient collection rate of apheresis plateau was <1%, but higher than the lack of adequate blood collection in 2005 and 2006 Comparison, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion After the implementation of the quality management system, the overall received good results, but there are still some of the quality objectives did not meet the quality standards set forth in this site quality objectives and requirements.