论文部分内容阅读
主持人:本刊今年第五期发表了《他有权继承老伴遗产》一文后,浙江读者张先生来信,对此文提出了不同的看法。现将张先生来信的主要内容摘编刊登,并请原作者对张先生的来信做了答复。 一、来信编辑同志: 读了2002年第五期《长寿》杂志上发表的《他有权继承老伴遗产》一文,我有不明白之处,现请教律师。按照律师的说法,本来是许女士与前夫共置的财产(三间住房),其中有1.25间将归高先生所有。这样,将来高先生百年之后,这1.25间住房就有可能归高先生的后人,那么,许女士的后人不就吃亏了吗?现在,有许多老年人再婚遭到子女的反对,主要是再婚前财产继承权没解决好。我认为正确的处理方法是:此1.25间面积的房子,高先生可居住到死,死后房子仍应归许女士后人继承。这样才比较公平。我的说法对吗? 浙江临安市读者 张致和(化名)
Moderator: The fifth issue of this year published “he has the right to inherit my wife heritage,” a text, Zhejiang readers Mr. Zhang, the paper made a different view. The main content of Mr. Zhang’s letter is now abstracted and invited the original author to reply to Mr. Zhang’s letter. First, the letter edit comrades: read the fifth issue of “longevity” magazine in 2002, “he has the right to inherit his wife heritage,” a text, I do not understand the Department, consult a lawyer. According to the lawyer, she had originally been the property (three houses) that Ms. Xu co-located with her ex-husband, and 1.25 of them would be owned by Mr. Gao. In this way, in the future, Mr. Gao will have a chance of returning to his descendants in the future after a century, then is Ms. Xu’s descendants not to lose? Now, many elderly people are opposed to their children by remarrying mainly Pre-marital property inheritance did not solve well. I think the correct approach is: The 1.25 area of the house, Mr. Gao can live to death, after the death of the house should still be owned by Ms. descendants succession. This is more fair. My argument is right? Zhang’an, Zhejiang readers readers (a pseudonym)