论文部分内容阅读
法律的效力是法律存在的标志,因此法律原则的效力标准就是法律原则在本体论意义上的存在条件。德沃金主要借由法律原则在个案适用时相对于法律规则的特点,认定法律原则与规则之间的逻辑差异。然而,并不能由此简单地说法律原则的效力标准只是基于内容或道德论证的。实际上,同样存在基于系谱或来源的法律原则。同时,如果将法律原则的存在与其在个案中的适用剥离开来,则法律原则的存在即便需要借助道德论证,这种论证的过程本身也有可能是基于来源或系谱的。因此,法律原则与法律规则在本体论上的差异不应该被夸大。
The validity of the law is a sign of the existence of the law. Therefore, the standard of validity of the principle of law is the existence of the principle of law in the ontological sense. Dworkin identifies the logical differences between legal principles and rules mainly through the principle of law in relation to the characteristics of legal rules when the case is applicable. However, it can not be simply said that the standard of validity of legal principles is based on content or moral justification alone. In fact, there are also legal principles based on pedigree or source. At the same time, if the existence of the principle of law is peeled off from its application in a particular case, the existence of the principle of law may itself be based on source or pedigree, even if moral justification is required. Therefore, the ontological differences between legal and legal rules should not be exaggerated.