在历史圈子里,流派甚多,尤其在西方学界,光是弄清那些流派的起源、宗旨、方法、代表人物及著作就让人头大。巴尔赞、麦克尼尔、霍布斯鲍姆、布罗代尔之作品,几乎是硬读,磕磕绊绊而数度中断。待读唐诺的《眼前》,竟如孙猴子在菩提祖师的课堂上手舞足蹈,彻底体验了一把“六经注我”的快乐。乃有所悟,同一历史,方家解读各不相同,读者又何必被动跟着人家走?唐诺历史科班出身,然而他读《左传》却是文学家的眼光。读罢让我对“读史使人明 There are many schools of thought in the history circle, especially in western academia, just to make clear the origins, purposes, methods, representatives and writings of those schools. Balzan, McNeil, Hobsbawm, Braudel’s work, almost hard-reading, stumbling and several interruptions. To be read Donald’s ”immediate“, actually as the Monkey in the Bodhi patriarch class dance, thoroughly experienced a ”Six Notes me“ happiness. There is enlightenment, the same history, Fang Jia interpretation of different, why should readers passively follow others? Donaldo history Keban origin, but he read ”Zuo Zhuan" is a writer’s vision. Reading let me know about history