论文部分内容阅读
目的对比传统手术和小切口微创手术治疗小儿疝气的临床疗效。方法将小儿疝气患儿110例随机均分为观察组和对照组各55例,观察组应用小切口微创手术治疗,对照组采用传统手术方法治疗,对比2组患儿的临床疗效。结果观察组患儿的手术时间、手术切口长度、术后自主活动时间和手术后住院时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,并发症发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论小切口微创手术治疗用于小儿疝气的治疗取得了良好的临床疗效,改善了患儿的各项临床指标,减轻了术后并发症的发生,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of traditional surgery and minimally invasive minimally invasive surgery in children with hernia. Methods A total of 110 children with pediatric hernia were randomly divided into observation group (55 cases) and control group (55 cases). The observation group was treated by minimally invasive surgery. The control group was treated by traditional surgical method. The clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. Results The operation time, the incision length, the postoperative voluntary activity time and the postoperative hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group. The blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group, and the complication rate was lower than that in the control group Statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion Small incision minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of pediatric hernia achieved good clinical efficacy, improve the clinical indicators in children and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, it is worthy of clinical application.