论文部分内容阅读
人民检察院作为我国法定的法律监督机关,对人民法院作出的判决、裁定,认为确有错误时,可以依法向上一级人民法院提出抗诉,要求人民法院重新审理。但作为公权力一种的刑事抗诉权的行使必须受到一定条件的制约,以防止权力的滥用。二审刑事抗诉应该符合《最高人民检察院关于刑事抗诉工作的若干意见》的规定,并不应超越一审起诉的范围,否则就是越权。对于一审起诉确有错误的,应按检察机关内部监督程序处理。
As the legal supervisory organ of our country, People’s Procuratorate, when making a judgment or ruling on a people’s court, concludes that there is indeed a mistake, it may, according to law, file a protest with the people’s court at a higher level and require the people’s court to retrial. However, as a kind of public power, the exercise of criminal counter-appeal must be conditioned by certain conditions to prevent the abuse of power. The second instance criminal protest should meet the “Supreme People’s Procuratorate on the work of criminal protest a number of opinions,” the provisions should not go beyond the scope of first instance prosecution, or is ultra vires. The prosecution for the first instance is indeed wrong, should be prosecutors internal oversight procedures.