论文部分内容阅读
[目的]比较腹腔镜下结肠癌根治术和传统开腹术的临床治疗效果。[方法]比较同一手术组施行的28例腹腔镜和30例传统开腹结肠癌根治病例的手术安全性、术后恢复、肿瘤根治性和随访结果。[结果]腹腔镜和开腹组均无手术死亡病例;腹腔镜组术中出血量明显少于开腹组;术后排气时间、腹痛时间、住院时间显著性短于开腹组;两组5年生存率、淋巴结清除数目、切口种植转移情况无统计学差异。[结论]腹腔镜下结肠癌根治可以达到与传统结肠癌根治术同样的根治效果,且手术创伤小,恢复快。
[Objective] To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic radical mastectomy and traditional laparotomy. [Method] The operative safety, postoperative recovery, radical curative effect and follow-up results of 28 patients undergoing laparoscopy and 30 patients with conventional open colon cancer treated by the same operation group were compared. [Results] There were no cases of death in both laparoscopic and open laparotomy groups. The bleeding volume in laparoscopic group was significantly less than that in open laparotomy group. The time of extubation, abdominal pain and hospital stay were significantly shorter than those in laparotomy group. 5-year survival rate, the number of lymph node dissection, incision implantation metastasis was no significant difference. [Conclusions] Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy can achieve the same curative effect as traditional radical gastrectomy, with less trauma and faster recovery.