论文部分内容阅读
由于诸多原因,史学界对辛亥革命的评价较为复杂。《剑桥中华民国史》概括说,“第一种是强调军阀主义开始了,政治统一解体,一种不讲道德的、背信弃义的溃散情绪在当权者中蔓延。这种观点认为,革命的胜利,即使在胜利的当时,已经变得没有意义了。第二种看法强调同革命前年代的连续性,不把辛亥革命看成是中国政体衰落中的又一事件,而把它看成是民族主义运动的早期高潮,给政治和社
For many reasons, the evaluation of the Revolution of 1911 by historians and scholars is rather complicated. The history of the Republic of Cambridge in Cambridge concludes: ”The first is to emphasize that the beginning of warlordism, the dissolution of political unity, and the unscrupulous, perfidious sentiments of vandalism are spreading among those in power. This view holds that the triumph of the revolution , Became meaningless even at the time of victory.The second view emphasized the continuity with the pre-revolutionary era, did not regard the Revolution of 1911 as another event in the decline of the Chinese political system, and regarded it as a national The early climax of theist movement gave politics and community