人们常说:第一个把少女比喻成花朵的是天才,第二个作此比喻的是庸才,第三个作这样比喻的就是蠢材。这种说法,用在解释民法保护著作权的目的与范围问题上,可谓精辟。民法保护的是创造性的表达或者描述。第二个、第三个用花朵比喻少女的人因为缺乏属于自己的表述,被人们认为是庸才、蠢材。人世间的天才毕竟是少数,芸芸众生多为平凡之辈。如果民法要求凡人每每自行创作,绝对不可重复天才们的表述,似乎强人所难。天才的创作才华既然是常人可望而不可即的,不如让他们尽情发挥自己的才能专司创作,而凡人需要之时则来援引、使用 It is often said that the first genius to paraphrase a girl into a flower is the second one to be a mediocre, and the third is to be foolish to make such a metaphor. This view can be described as incisive in explaining the purpose and scope of copyright protection in civil law. Civil law protects creative expression or description. The second and the third metaphor for girls because of the lack of their own statements, people are considered mediocre, blurred. After all, the world’s genius is a minority, mortal beings and more for the average generation. If civil law requires mortal self-creation, it is absolutely not repeatable genius’s statement, it seems hard to be strong. Since the talented creative talent is beyond all expectations, it is better for them to give full play to their own talents and to make creative works. However, when the ordinary people need it, they can be invoked and used