罗兰·巴尔特从特鲁别茨柯伊、叶姆斯列夫和布隆达尔的结构语言学中挪用了“中性”这一概念,并且经过一系列创造性转换,将它确立自己的方法论。以此为手段,他对隐藏在语言结构和话语领域的意识形态进行了解构。但是由于巴尔特晚期将“中性”和古代怀疑论以及东方的禅道哲学结合起来,这一错误的理论嫁接不但削弱了其理论解构的锋芒,更重要的是使他本人陷入了寂静主义的泥沼,由此反映出巴尔特理论的限度。 Roland Barthes embraces the notion of “neutrality” from the structural linguistics of Trudeczko, Yevselev, and Brunardar, and through a series of creative transformations establishes itself as a methodology . Using this as a means, he deconstructs the ideology hidden in the field of language structure and discourse. However, due to the combination of “neutral” with ancient skepticism and Zen Buddhism in the East in Late Barthes, this erroneous theoretical grafting has not only undermined the sharpness of his theoretical deconstruction, but more importantly left himself in silence Dilemma of the doctrine, thus reflecting the limits of Barthes theory.