论文部分内容阅读
《侵权责任法》颁布前,《未成年人保护法》、《合同法》、《消费者权益保护法》和《关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》等单行法律及法律解释对某些特殊场所、单位等设定了一定范围内的安全保障义务,其义务主体、保障前提、保护对象均具有特殊性。《侵权责任法》颁布后,其第37条正式确立了安全保障义务制度,但该条第2款在理论上及实务上仍存在较大的争议。本文主要就第37条第2款对补充责任进行分析并提出笔者自己的观点及建议。
Prior to the Tort Liability Law, the Law on the Protection of Minors, the Contract Law, the Law on Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests and the Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases Some special places, units, etc. set a certain range of security obligations, the main obligations, safeguard the premise, the object of protection are of particularity. After the Tort Liability Law was enacted, Article 37 of the Law of Torts formally established the system of safety and security obligations. However, there is still much controversy in the theoretical and practical aspects of paragraph 2 of the article. This article mainly analyzes the supplementary responsibility of article 37, paragraph 2 and puts forward my own opinions and suggestions.