《文心雕龙》对玄学本体论提出批评 ,肯定佛教“般若绝境” ,有研究者据此认为刘勰思想是“以佛统儒”。其实刘勰所否定的是将“无”或“有”绝对化 ,并未全盘否定玄学本体论 ,王弼本体论则为《文心雕龙》所本。刘勰从本体论角度肯定“般若绝境” ,认为般若学与王弼本体论相同 ,立论允当 ,能“诣正理”。因此 ,“以佛统儒”说是误解其所据的结果 ,与刘勰思想实际不合。 Wen Xin Diao Long criticized the metaphysics ontology and affirmed that Buddhism was “completely destroyed”. Some researchers think that Liu Xie’s thought is “based on Buddhism and Confucianism.” In fact, what Liu Xie denied is the absolute or “no” absolute, did not completely negate the metaphysics ontology, Wangbi ontology is “Wen Xin Diao Long” by the. From the perspective of ontology, Liu Xie affirmed “Perplexity” that Buddhism and Wang Bi the same ontology, the legislation allowed, can “justify.” Therefore, saying “Buddhism and Confucianism as Confucianism” is a misunderstanding of the results of what it is based on, and it really does not conform to Liu Xie’s thought.