论文部分内容阅读
自香港学者金耀基提出“行政吸纳政治”的概念后,许多研究开始以“行政吸纳”解释大陆威权政治下的社会治理;但对于“行政吸纳”概念的前提和内涵,讨论却并不充分。通过对现有研究的梳理和概念的再辨析,本文认为“行政吸纳”的根本逻辑是用行政方式消解政治诉求,为此行政体系代偿性地承担了政治职能。基于华东某省的田野调查,本文认为地方网络舆情治理中也存在“行政吸纳”的模式。该模式在一定程度上促进了民意的有序表达和整合,但也显示出行政方式应对网络舆情现实诉求的乏力。
Since Hong Kong scholar Jin Yaoji put forward the concept of “political absorbing politics”, many researches started to explain the social governance under the authoritarian politics in mainland China with “administrative absorption”. However, the premise and connotation of the concept of “administrative absorbing” But not enough. Through reviewing the existing research and re-conceptualizing it, this paper argues that the fundamental logic of “administrative absorption” is to eliminate the political demands by administrative means, and for this reason, the administrative system takes on political functions on a compensatory basis. Based on the fieldwork of a province in eastern China, this paper argues that there is also a model of “administrative absorption” in the management of public opinion in local networks. To a certain extent, this model promotes the orderly expression and integration of public opinions, but also shows the weakness of the administration mode in responding to the real demands of online public opinion.