论文部分内容阅读
目的分析比较不同捕蝇器具的捕蝇效果。方法选取绿化地、餐饮店、菜市场和农户4种类型的场地各1处,采用分组配对现场对照观察法对迷宫式捕蝇笼、宫灯式捕蝇笼和粘蝇纸3种不同的捕蝇器具进行4天捕蝇效果观察。结果迷宫式捕蝇笼捕蝇930只,平均58.1只/(笼·d);宫灯式捕蝇笼捕蝇348只,平均21.8只/(笼·d);粘蝇纸捕蝇314只,平均19.6只/(张·d)。迷宫式捕蝇笼效果优于宫灯式捕蝇笼和粘蝇纸(P<0.01)。宫灯式捕蝇笼与粘蝇纸比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论迷宫式捕蝇笼具有小巧易携带,捕蝇效果好且捕获后不易出逃等优点,是捕蝇的理想工具。
Objective To analyze and compare the trapping effects of different traps. Methods Four sites of green land, restaurant, vegetable market and farmer were selected. One group of field catches were collected by field test. The effects of labyrinth catching cage, lantern catching cage and sticky fly catching paper on three different catches Appliance for 4 days to catch the fly observation effect. Results A total of 930 labyrinthine fly catching flies were collected, with an average of 58.1 / (cage · d). There were 348 catches of lantern catches, averaging 21.8 / (cage · d) 19.6 / (Zhang · d). The effect of labyrinth catching cage was better than that of lantern catching cage and sticky fly paper (P <0.01). There was no significant difference between lantern catching cage and sticky fly paper (P> 0.05). Conclusion The labyrinthine catching cage has the advantages of compact and easy to carry, good trapping and catching effect, and is not easy to flee after being caught. It is an ideal tool for catching flies.