论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较阴道B超与腹部B超在异位妊娠诊断中的临床应用价值。方法:将2012年6月-2013年6月收治的74例疑似异位妊娠患者随机分为观察组与对照组各37例,分别给予阴道B超和腹部B超检查,比较两组的诊断准确率。结果:观察组患者的诊断符合率为91.89%(34/37),明显高于对照组的81.08%(30/37)(P<0.05);观察组显示孕囊或包块的时间与选择手术时间明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:与应用腹部B超相比较,应用阴道B超诊断的异位妊娠诊断符合率更高,且显示孕囊或包块的时间与患者选择手术时间更短。
Objective: To compare the clinical value of vaginal ultrasonography and abdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Methods: Seventy-four patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy who were admitted to our hospital from June 2012 to June 2013 were randomly divided into observation group (37 cases) and control group (37 cases), respectively. B-ultrasound and B-ultrasound were given respectively. rate. Results: The diagnostic coincidence rate of the observation group was 91.89% (34/37), which was significantly higher than that of the control group (81.08%, 30/37) (P <0.05). The observation group showed that gestational sac or mass Time was significantly better than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the application of abdominal B-ultrasound, diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy by vaginal B-ultrasound is more accurate and shows that gestational sac or mass is shorter than patient’s choice.