论文部分内容阅读
The paper is focused on 2,4,6,4′,6′,2″,4″,6″-octanitro[1,1′,3′,1″]-terphenyl (ONT), 2,2′,2″,4,4′,4″,6,6′,6″-nonanitro[1,1′,3′,1″]-terphenyl (NONA), 2,4,6-tris(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl)-1,3,5-triazine (TPT), N,N-bis(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-2,4,6-trinitroaniline (NTFA), 2,2′,4,4′,6,6′-hexanitrobiphenyl (HNB), 1,3-dinitrobenzene (1,3-DNB) and 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene (TNB). The initiation reactivity of these substances has been studied by means of the data obtained from non-isothermal differential thermal analysis (DTA), their ignition temperatures, impact sensitivity, the data obtained from the Russian manometric method and the detonation characteristics. For comparison, also the data published about 2,2′,2″,2″′,4,4′,4″,4″′,6,6′,6″,6″′-dodecanitro-[1,3′,1′,1″]quaterphenyl (DODECA) have been included. The paper specifies and discusses the relationships between the results of various methods used, inclusive of the forms of modified Evans-Polanyi-Semenov relationship. It has been stated that the technologically most attractive substances, out of those studied, can be ordered in the sequence ONT-TPT-NONA-NTFA according to their increasing thermal reactivity.