论文部分内容阅读
97年《刑法》中关于著作权犯罪的规定来源于1991年实施的我国首部《著作权法》。而该《著作权法》为适应传播技术的发展及著作权保护国际化的需要于2001年做了修改,并增设了刑事责任条款。但《刑法》并未随之修改,导致《刑法》与现行《著作权法》在“发行”等专业术语、著作权保护的作品种类、侵害著作权的行为方式等方面存在冲突与不一致,无法适应打击侵犯著作权的实际需要。因此,应修改《刑法》中著作权犯罪的内容或改变附属刑法的依附地位,将著作权犯罪有关内容包括刑事责任、刑罚适用等直接规定于《著作权法》中,以适应著作权保护制度不断变化的需要。
The provisions of the Criminal Code of 1997 on copyright crimes originated from the first copyright law of China, which was implemented in 1991. The “Copyright Law” was adapted in 2001 to meet the needs of the development of communication technology and the internationalization of copyright protection, and added criminal liability provisions. However, the “Criminal Law” has not been amended accordingly. As a result, there is conflict and inconsistency between the Criminal Law and the current “Copyright Law” in such professional terms as “distribution”, types of works protected by copyrights and behaviors infringing on copyrights, Crack down on the actual needs of copyright infringement. Therefore, we should modify the contents of the crime of copyrights in the Criminal Law or change the dependent status of the attached criminal law. We should directly stipulate the relevant contents of the crime of criminal copyright, including the criminal responsibility and the applicable penalties, in the Copyright Law to meet the changing needs of the copyright protection system .