论文部分内容阅读
基于对陆淳《春秋》学撰著和相关文献的分析,从《春秋》宗旨的解读、《春秋》辞义的显隐、对“三传”的评价和“无经之传”的取舍等几个方面考察啖助、赵匡的差异,在此基础上探讨陆淳对二者学说的取舍、继承和发展,可知陆淳较好地结合了啖助和赵匡的思想并有所发展,理顺了唐中后期新《春秋》学的思想体系,确立了该学派启发后学的两个重要发展方向,即走向义理和经世的经学研究,对新《春秋》学派的形成和发展有重要贡献。
Based on the analysis of Lu Chun's Spring and Autumn Annals and related literatures, from the interpretation of the purpose of Spring and Autumn Annals, the explicit implication of “Spring and Autumn”, the evaluation of “Three Biography” and the “ On the basis of this study, Lu Chun discusses the trade-offs, inheritance and development of the two theories. It can be seen that Lu Chun has well combined the ideas of Zhao and Kuang Kuang with Developed and straightened out the ideological system of the new ”Spring and Autumn“ study in the late Tang and Mid-Tang Dynasties, and established two important development directions of the school, namely, the study of Confucian classics that guided the justice and the classics and the formation of the new ”Spring and Autumn" school And development has made important contributions.