论文部分内容阅读
有人戏言:“经济学家一预言,人类就发笑。”经济学家似乎一直无法担当起“经济天气预报员”的责任,甚至在经济学家内部,他们对所有基本问题的看法似乎都存在分歧。由此,我们不禁要问:经济学家可信吗?经济学家存在的意义何在?想象一下,假如你是14世纪某个时期的英格兰皇家御医。王子生病了,你应召来救助。你请来两位专家提供建议。第一位说:“用水蛭把有害的体液吸出来。”第二个说:“不行,你必须得给他放血,让有害的体液排出来。”他们开始争论,用恶毒的书信体诗文相互侮辱对方。放血男声称:“水蛭男背地里正在为法国人效力!”水蛭男回击道:“放血男就是想要王子的命,因为王子曾想要给贵族们加税!”
Someone jokes: “Economists predict that human beings will laugh. ” Economists seem to have been unable to assume responsibility for “economic forecasters,” and even within economists their views on all the basic issues There seems to be differences. From this we can not help but ask: Is economists credible? What is the point of economists? Imagine if you were a Royal English physician at some point in the 14th century. Prince is sick, you should call for help. You invited two experts for advice. The first one said: “The second said: ” No, you have to give him blood to let the harmful body fluids discharged. “They began to argue with the vicious Epistolary poetry insult each other. The blond men claim: ”Leech men are playing for the French!“ ”The leech men hit back:“ The blond is the prince’s life because the prince wanted to raise taxes for the nobility! ”