《物权法》对物下的定义过于简单,与我国社会生活实践严重脱节,在未来《民法典》中有必要对物的概念重新定义。目前,我国已有的几个物权法的专家建议稿与《物权法》相比,在立法技术和涵盖范围方面均有不同,有些方面值得未来立法借鉴。物的概念关系整个财产法的立法基础,需要单设条文详细规定。条文的设置,宜采用一般性规定+特别规定的模式,对物下个较为全面的名至实归的定义。 The definition of things under the Real Right Law is too simple and is seriously out of line with the practice of social life in our country. In the future Civil Code, it is necessary to redefine the concept of things. At present, there are several expert suggestions on property law in our country that are different from the “Real Right Law” in terms of legislative technology and coverage, and some areas are worth learning from in the future. The concept of material relations The entire legislative basis of property law, the need for a single provision detailed provisions. The provisions of the provision should adopt the general provisions + special provisions of the model, a more comprehensive under the name of the real definition.