关于民法典的制定与否以及如何制定的问题,学者之间有较大分歧。纵观这些分歧无一例外会得到这样的结论,即学者大多是以法学为出发点的,另一少部分学者站到了政治学和社会学的角度意在分析民法典制定的社会条件和政治基础;还有学者着重于关注民法典制定的哲学基础,提出分析其价值理性和形式理性。但学者更多关注的是民法典的制定于法学来说是否合情合理,为此笔者欲从经济学的一些基本原理来论证民法典制定中的若干问题,以期能够提出新的研究思路。 On the formulation of civil code and how to make the issue, scholars have big differences between. Throughout these disagreements, we can all come to the conclusion that most scholars start from the point of jurisprudence while the other few stand in the angle of political science and sociology to analyze the social conditions and political foundation for the formulation of civil code. Some scholars also focus on the philosophical basis for the formulation of civil code, and propose to analyze its value rationality and formal rationality. However, scholars pay more attention to whether the formulation of civil code is fair and reasonable in jurisprudence. To do so, I would like to demonstrate some issues in the formulation of civil code from some basic principles of economics with a view to proposing new research ideas.