论文部分内容阅读
我国传统刑法学一般认为,社会危害性是犯罪构成实质判断的基础,犯罪构成四要件从不同侧面反映社会危害性,并以共同体的形式反映犯罪行为的社会危害性。目前社会危害性的应然功能不能发挥,存在论域混乱、角色混乱、全面判断缺失、客观危害和主观恶性缺少规范性研究四方面困境。解决这些困境的出路不能是仅承认社会危害性的客观属性或全面引进违法与有责体系,应在客观危害与主观恶性对立统一的前提下引进法益理论和期待可能性理论,规范研究客观危害和主观恶性。
The traditional criminal law in our country generally believes that the social harmfulness is the basis for the substantive judgment of crime, and the four elements of the constitution of crime reflect the harmfulness of society from different aspects, and reflects the social harmfulness of criminal behavior in the form of community. At present, the harmfulness of society should not function properly, there are four difficulties in discourse of domain disorder, chaos in character, lack of comprehensive judgment, objective harm and lack of normative research on subjective viciousness. The solution to these dilemmas can not be the objective attribute of recognizing only the harmfulness of society or the introduction of the system of illegality and responsibility in an all-round way. We should introduce the theory of legal interest and expectancy possibility under the premise of the unity of opposites between objective hazard and subjective viciousness, Subjective viciousness.