论文部分内容阅读
历年来,国内不少卫生机构对发锰的诊断价值进行了探讨,多数认为它是人体接触锰的评价指标,对锰中毒早期诊断意义不大,而可作为诊断参考指标,但也有异议,发锰值可因地域差异及实验方法不同而有较大差别,并受各种因素的影响,为了研制本地区发锰正常值并探讨其评定触锰损害的意义,我们对昆明地区100例非触锰者进行发锰测定,同时检测100例触锰者作为对照。现将结果报道于下。实验对象和方法 1.实验对象选择昆明地区身体健康,无锰作业接触史的教师,医务人员,干部,工人等100名,其中男37,女63,年龄22—53岁(平均30.9岁)作为非触锰组(A
Over the years, many domestic health institutions on the diagnosis of hair manganese were discussed, most think it is human exposure to manganese evaluation index, little significance for the early diagnosis of manganese poisoning, and can be used as a diagnostic reference, but there are objections, hair Manganese value may vary greatly due to different geographical and experimental methods and is affected by various factors. In order to develop normal values of manganese in the area and explore the significance of manganese value in assessing manganese damage, Manganese manganese determination were made, while testing 100 cases of manganese as a control. Now the results reported below. Subjects and methods 1. Subjects 100 teachers, medical staff, cadres and workers, including 37, 63 and 22-53 years of age (average 30.9 years old), who were in good health and had no history of exposure to manganese in Kunming, were selected as Non-touch manganese group (A