得知传染病医院将在家门前拔地而起时,业主们开始表达不满:联系跨国企业,写信给有关领导;濮存昕也在“两会”期间提交了相关提案。5月12日,业主诉北京市环保局案开庭。作为第二被告,地坛医院的搬迁被认为“会对周边环境造成无法估量的危害”,而选址过程“并不透明”。这场官司打到了北京第一中级法院。在其他省市都发生过此类争端——不光是传染病医院,还包括省、市、县三级疾控中心的选址。可见,传染病医院和疾控中心的选址,并非小事,它牵动着周边无数百姓关注生存的那颗心 When they learned that the infectious disease hospital would rise up in front of their homes, the owners began to express dissatisfaction: contact multinational corporations and write to relevant leaders; Zeng Cunyi also submitted relevant proposals during the “two sessions”. On May 12, the owner sued the Beijing Environmental Protection Bureau for a hearing. As the second defendant, the relocation of Ditan Hospital was considered to be “incalculable harm to the surrounding environment” and the site selection process was “not transparent”. This lawsuit hit the Beijing First Intermediate Court. Such disputes have occurred in other provinces and cities—not only infectious diseases hospitals, but also the provincial, city, and county level disease control centers. It can be seen that the location of the infectious disease hospital and the CDC is not a trivial matter. It affects the hearts of the surrounding people who are not concerned about surviving.