论文部分内容阅读
20世纪50年代以来,以杜娜叶夫斯卡娅、凯文·安德森为代表的美国左派学者致力于对列宁“哲学笔记”进行人学解读。他们提出了“前黑格尔的列宁”和“黑格尔的列宁”两个列宁的对立形象,不仅认为列宁在“哲学笔记”中转向了哲学唯心主义,“哲学笔记”也构成了其1914年之后政治经济著作的理论基础,而且还进一步把列宁的“哲学笔记”人道主义化,并试图揭示列宁“哲学笔记”中所谓的哲学上的矛盾心态。列宁“哲学笔记”的这种人学批判解读根植于从卢卡奇、柯尔施到马尔库塞的马克思主义黑格尔主义化的理论运动,对于我们今天重新思考列宁的“哲学笔记”具有启示意义。
Since the 1950s, American leftists, represented by Duna Evskaya and Kevin Anderson, devoted themselves to carrying out anthropological interpretations of Lenin’s “Philosophical Notes”. They proposed the opposite image of Lenin between “Lenin Hegel of Hegel” and “Lenin of Hegel” not only that Lenin turned to philosophy idealism in his “Philosophical Notes”, but “philosophy Notes ”also constitute the theoretical basis of his political and economic writings after 1914, but also further humanitarianize Lenin’s“ Philosophical Notes ”and try to reveal the so-called philosophical contradictions in Lenin’s“ Philosophical Notes ” Mentality. This critical anthropological interpretation of Lenin’s “Philosophical Notes” is rooted in the Marxist Hegelian theoretical movement from Lukacs, Kohltür to Marcuse, and a “philosophy” of reconsidering Lenin today Notes "has enlightenment significance.