论文部分内容阅读
我院在1970年以前,对会阴缝合采用丝线外缝,因床位紧张要等待拆线,满足不了分娩高峰时产妇住院。为了提高床位周转,我们在会阴无结缝合法的基础上,改为肠线埋藏缝合。根据多年的临床实践,应用此法效果良好,并在妇科普查中得到证实。此法愈后斑痕小,有的甚至很难看出原伤口处。为了检验两种缝合法的效果是否相同,我院在1986年3～10月间,对会阴侧切术中内、外缝合的愈后情况进行了观察对比。 (一)临床资料 1.将产妇和助产人员随机分成内缝和外
In our hospital before 1970, perineal suture using silk outer seams, due to tight beds to wait for stitches, unable to meet the delivery peak maternal hospitalization. In order to improve the bed turnover, we have no legal basis in the perineal closure, catgut instead of catgut. According to years of clinical practice, the application of this method is good, and confirmed in the gynecological census. This method of healing after the small scars, and some even difficult to see the original wound. In order to test whether the two sutures the same effect, our hospital from March to October 1986, the episiotomy in the episiotomy, external suture healing after the situation were observed and compared. (A) of the clinical data 1. Maternal and midwifery personnel were randomly divided into internal and external joints