论文部分内容阅读
【目的】分析Web of Science(Wo S)数据库中论文文献级别用量指标(使用次数)与被引频次的分布情况及其相关性,以揭示论文使用与被引的规律及相关关系。【方法】收集2013~2015年Wo S数据库收录信息科学与图书情报学领域被引频次TOP5%、使用次数TOP5%论文数据,分析文献类型,被引频次和使用次数的年度表现及其相关性。【结果】被引频次TOP5%、使用次数TOP5%以及两者重合文献主要类型均为Article。使用次数(180天)和被引频次三年间差异显著:前者2015年>2014年>2013年(均为P<0.05),后者表现相反。使用次数(2013年至今)、使用次数(180天)和被引频次弱相关(均为P<0.05);各年度中除2015年外均有相关性。【结论】引文时间窗口越长,论文被引频次越高,一定时间内学者们更倾向于使用较新的文献;也揭示了论文使用与被引之间存在的共性,这种共性和引文时间窗口有关。
【Objective】 The purpose of this study is to analyze the distribution and relevance of the dosage level (number of uses) and citation frequency of the paper literature level in the Web of Science (Wo S) database to reveal the rules of the use and citation of the essay. 【Method】 The collected data of TOP 5%, TOP5% of the papers in the field of Information Science and Library and Information Science from 2013 to 2015 were collected in Wo S database. The annual performance and its correlation of the types of articles, times of cited citations and times of use were analyzed. 【Result】 The results showed that TOP5% of citation frequency, TOP5% of frequency of use, and the main type of coincidence literature are both Article. There was a significant difference between the number of times of using (180 days) and the frequency of citation in three years: the former was 2015> the year of 2014> the year of 2013 (both P <0.05), while the latter was opposite. Frequency of use (from 2013 to now), number of times of use (180 days) and frequency of citation were weak (all P <0.05); [Conclusion] The longer the citation time window, the higher the citation frequency of the essay is, the more the scholars tend to use the newer documents in a certain period of time. The commonalities between the essay usage and the citation are also revealed. This commonalization and citation time Window related.