论文部分内容阅读
[摘要] 目的 探讨临床护理路径用于ICU重症颅脑损伤患者护理中的价值。 方法 选择2017年11月～2018年10月进行ICU重症颅脑损伤治疗的患者100例作为对象，随机数字表法分为对照组（n=50）和观察组（n=50）。对照组给予常规护理，观察组在其基础上应用临床护理路径，15 d护理后比较患者依从性情况、对患者护理前后心理状态进行评分，对不良并发症产生情况进行比较。 结果 观察组康复锻炼依从、按时用药依从及饮食依从高于对照组（P<0.05）。护理前两组SDS与SAS评分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），护理后，观察组SDS与SAS评分低于对照组（P<0.05）。观察组出现压瘡、泌尿感染、以及发热的发生率显著低于对照组（P<0.05）。 结论 将临床护理路径用于ICU重症颅脑损伤患者的护理中，提高了患者的护理依从性，减少了不良情绪以及不良并发症的产生，有助于患者整体治疗，值得推广应用。
[关键词] 临床护理路径;重症颅脑损伤患者;常规护理;护理依从性
[Abstract] Objective To explore the value of clinical nursing pathway in patients with severe head injury in ICU. Methods 100 patients with severe head injury in ICU from November 2017 to October 2018 were selected as subjects. They were divided into the control group（n=50） and the observation group（n=50） using the random number table method. The control group was given routine care， while the observation group applied the clinical nursing pathway based on the control group. After 15 days of nursing， the compliance， psychological states score， and the incidence of adverse complications were compared between the two groups. Results The compliance of rehabilitation exercise， timely medication， and diet in the observation group was higher than that in control group（P
[关键词] 临床护理路径;重症颅脑损伤患者;常规护理;护理依从性
[Abstract] Objective To explore the value of clinical nursing pathway in patients with severe head injury in ICU. Methods 100 patients with severe head injury in ICU from November 2017 to October 2018 were selected as subjects. They were divided into the control group（n=50） and the observation group（n=50） using the random number table method. The control group was given routine care， while the observation group applied the clinical nursing pathway based on the control group. After 15 days of nursing， the compliance， psychological states score， and the incidence of adverse complications were compared between the two groups. Results The compliance of rehabilitation exercise， timely medication， and diet in the observation group was higher than that in control group（P