在本刊前一期里,我们曾经摘译了《泰晤士报文学增刊》关于加缪的一篇评述,并指斥了加缪对阿尔及利亚民族独立运动采取的起然态度。在本文里,我们也可以看出,加缪虽被肯定为“左派”,但却是作者寄予拯救欧洲的非共产主义左派,那末他的真面目就不难想见了。文中说,加缪的一个决心是把道德的语言重新加到政治语言中去,但是事实上加缪真正在做的却是回避政治斗争而代之以抽象的道德价值,因此虽则满口对阿尔及利亚人民的同情,他这个“左派”是和伪善者没有分别的。 In the first issue of this issue, we have extracted a commentary on Camus in The Times Literature Supplement and denounced Camus’s faddy attitude toward the national independence movement in Algeria. In this article, we can also see that although Camus was certainly “leftist,” but it was the author’s non-communist left to save Europe, his true face would not be hard to imagine. The article argues that Camus’ determination was to re-add moral language to political language, but in fact Camus was actually doing away with political struggles and replacing it with abstract moral values. Although he said that he was overly concerned with the Algerian people His “Left” is no different from hypocrisy.