论文部分内容阅读
我国刑法中的抢劫罪分为四种类型,最高人民法院的司法解释单单要求转化型抢劫罪的主体责任年龄超过16周岁,导致主体责任年龄的不平等。转化型抢劫罪和其他类型抢劫罪实质危害相近,基于我国多元化犯罪概念的立法实际、有条件地对未成年人特殊保护的刑事政策和体系解释原则,应当承认相对刑事责任年龄人可以构成转化型抢劫罪,这种解释不违背罪刑法定原则。
The crime of robbery in criminal law of our country is divided into four types. The judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court merely requires that the principal responsibility of the crime of transformational robbery exceeds 16 years of age, leading to inequitable age of the principal responsibility. The crime of conversional robbery is similar in nature to the crimes of other types of robbery. Based on the legislative practice of the concept of pluralistic crimes in our country and the criminal policy and the system of interpretation principles for the conditional special protection of minors, it should be recognized that the relative criminal responsibility of age can constitute a conversion Type robbery, this interpretation does not violate the statutory principle of crime and punishment.