ON THE LIMIT CASE OF THE STEP-REDUCTION METHOD FOR CALCULATING NON-UNIFORM BEAM WITH VARIOUS SECTION

来源 :应用数学和力学:英文版 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:lzhongyue
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
In this paper,the step reduction method is discussed,which was advanced by Prof.YehKai-yuan for calculating a non-uniform beam with various sections.The following result isproved.The approximate solution by this method approaches the true solution if the
其他文献
According to the hypothesis that the dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy satisfieslog-normal distribution,a stochostic model of dissipation is provided and
五四后期,胡适等新文化人改变了全面反传统的态度,提出整理国故的主张,其中包含着对中国传统的理智认同。整理国故的根本目的在于,通过对传统资源的开发,发掘有生机的旧传统,既为五四前期的启蒙思想寻找传统的支持,也为嫁接西方现代文化和再造文明寻找传统的根基。在整理国故运动中,新文化人发掘了明清白话小说和历史悠久的古代白话文传统,为白话文运动寻找国语范本和历史的渊源;发掘了清代汉学的考据方法和一脉相承的古代科学方法论传统,为倡导西方现代科学方法寻找传统的支持;还发掘了中国古代的辨伪学和源远流长的疑古思想传统,为整理
分析方法学的研究是分析化学的主要研究领域之一。一种新的分析方法,从最初的概念出现、科学原理的形成、技术开发到不断完善,并最终走向实际的应用是一个漫长的过程。在这个
With an application of topological analysis,in this paper the skin-friction line patternson compressor and turbine cascade surfaces are depicted and the streaml
余英时先生考论章学诚“六经皆史”之论,以为“六经皆史”“实为针对东原‘道在六经’的基本假定而发,同时也是对顾亭林以来所谓‘经学即理学’的中心理论作一种最有系统的反挑战。”“从心理层次看,实斋十分需要一个源远流长的学统作为他自己的后盾,不然他将无法与承朱子之学数传而起的戴东原相匹敌。”“实斋说梨洲的浙东之学较之亭林为源远流长,又说南宋以来浙东儒哲言性命者必究于史.这些显然都不免有夸张之嫌。”
In this paper,the solution to the structure consisting of a bead and a board is given as aresult of the application of the subregion function method which was s
This paper is taken up for the following difference equation problem(P,)(L,y)<sub>k</sub>≡εy(k+1)+a(k,ε)y(k)+b(k,ε)y(k-1)=f(k,ε)(1≤k≤N-1),B<sub>1</sub>y≡-y(0)+c<sub>1</sub>
鲁迅曾在《藤野先生》和《呐喊.自序》中两次披露自己如何"弃医从文",围绕鲁迅自身的叙述,中日两国学界的"阅读"和"阐释"呈现不同形态。日本学界提出"弃医从文"叙述中存在"传说化"倾向,
By using the method in[3],several useful estimations of the derivatives of the solutionof the boundary value problem for a nonlinear ordinary differential equat
This paper proposes a formally stronger set-valued Caristi’s fixed point theorem and by using a simple method we give a direct proof for the equivalence betwee