论文部分内容阅读
一对于《论语·子路》“不得中行而与之,必也狂狷乎!狂者进取,狷者有所不为也”一语,有学者这样解释:“狂”与“狷”是两种对立的品质。一是流于冒进、进取、敢作敢为;一是流于退缩,不敢作为。还说,“孔子认为,中行就是不偏于狂,也不偏于狷。人的气质、作风、德行都不偏于任何一个方面,对立的双方应互相牵制,互相补充,这样,才符合于中庸的思想。”此处所说的“中行”便是“中庸”。按照这种说法,“狂”与“狷”不但互相对立,而且都不可取,因为违背中庸之道。这种解释,我以为曲解了孔子的本意。
One for the “Analects of Confucius” and “not with the Bank and with it, will be mad too mad! Crazy progressed, not those who do not” also has the scholar explained: “Mad ” and “狷 ”is the opposite of the two qualities. First, the flow of aggressive, enterprising, courageous; First, the flow of withdrawal, not as. He also said: “According to Confucius, the Bank of China is neither flippant nor biased in favor of humanity, nor does one’s temperament, style, or virtue act in any way. The two opposing sides should contain each other and supplement each other so that they are in conformity with the golden mean Thought. ”Here “ Bank of China ”is “ moderate ”. According to this view, “Mad ” and “狷 ” not only opposite each other, and are not desirable, because contrary to the golden mean. This explanation, I think, misinterpreted Confucius’s intentions.